GH Joint - Abduction

Abduction of the Glenohumeral Joint occurs as the Head of Humerus upwardly rotates in the frontal plane about an anterior-to-posterior axis on the Glenoid Fossa of Scapula (SOURCE-11). In layman’s terms, Abduction describes raising your arm overhead in a lateral direction. In the healthy shoulder, roughly 120º of Abduction occurs at the Glenohumeral Joint. The remaining 60º required to perform the full 180º available to The Shoulder Girdle is achieved through Scapulothoracic Joint - Upward Rotation . This coupling of motion at both joints is known as the Scapulohumeral Rhythm . Abduction is therefore an integral motion available to The Shoulder Girdle .


Key Structures

Bone

Muscle

Connective Tissue

Nerve

Fascia


Kinematics

As the Humerus Abducts away from the body the convex head of the Humerus rollssuperiorly (directed by the Supraspinatus ) andslidesinferiorly, remaining in close proximity to the Glenoid Fossa’s perpendicular (vertical) diameter (SOURCE-11). With the almost two-fold size disparity between the larger Humeral Head and longitudinal diameter of the Glenoid Fossa of Scapula ,roll-and-slidemechanics allow maximum motion without running out of articular surface (SOURCE-11). Compared to other directions of total arm elevation, Abduction requires slightly more contributions from the Scapula with a movement ratio of ~2.1:1 (Humerus:Scapula) and slightly more GH Joint - External Rotation to adequately clear the Head of Humerus from under the Acromion during the later stages of composite motion (SOURCE-18).

It is often reported that in the healthy shoulder the Supraspinatus facilitates the initial 15º of Abduction, after which it assists the Deltoid until roughly 90º of Abduction (SOURCE-11). One supporting factor for this is that the Moment Arms of the Anterior and Middle fibres of the Deltoid are smaller than those of the Supraspinatus , Infraspinatus and Subscapularis at low Abduction angles (0-40°). However by 60° these Moment Arms have more than doubled which is reflected in a peak activity of the Anterior + Middle fibres occurring between 60º-90º (SOURCE-13). The Moment Arm of the Anterior Fibres is further influenced by the extent of Humeral Rotation where added GH Joint - External Rotation can produce a favourable mechanical advantage even at 0º Abduction (SOURCE-13). Conversely, Abduction performed with GH Joint - Internal Rotation diminishes this advantage (SOURCE-13). Superior shear force bias of the Deltoid on the Humeral Head is offset by the depressor force couple of the Teres Major , Latissimus Dorsi and Pectoralis Major (SOURCE-17). While the majority of these joint depressors have a relatively consistent contribution across all planes of arm elevation, the Pectoralis Major is more suited to Abduction (SOURCE-17). With longer Moment Arms in arm elevation through Abduction the Supraspinatus , Subscapularis and Middle and Posterior Deltoid are most effective in this plane (SOURCE-17).The notion that the Supraspinatus initiates Abduction has been contended by recent literature which recorded near simultaneous pre-activity of both the Middle Deltoid and Supraspinatus prior to shoulder elevation, irrespective of load or plane (SOURCE-12). In either case, the contribution of these muscles are in close proximity and when one is impaired, the other may compensate (SOURCE-11+13). In terms of Torque , the following muscles contribute to Abduction (SOURCE-13):

Activation of these Glenohumeral Abductors also occurred in tandem with the axioscapular muscles contributing to Scapulothoracic Joint - Upward Rotation (SOURCE-12).

The Supraspinatus Tendon often blends with the Glenohumeral Joint Capsule and neighbouring Coracohumeral Ligament and Superior Glenohumeral Ligament which affords the capsule additional dynamic stability when the muscle contracts (SOURCE-11). On the distal end of the Glenohumeral Joint , the inferiorslidingof the Humeral Head pulls the Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament taut. The ligament acts as a hammock to afford additional stability as it approaches end-range (SOURCE-11).

Scapular Plane Abduction

While Frontal Plane abduction is often used in evaluation, Scapula Plane Abduction, also known asscaptionis a more natural/ functional movement. The Scapula Plane is roughly 35º anterior to the Frontal Plane. Movement in this plane helps avoid impingement and facilitates more Range of Motion as there is greater subacromial clearance, reducing the extent of GH Joint - External Rotation needed (SOURCE-18). In the frontal plane, the relatively greater degree of Scapulothoracic Joint - Retraction leads to higher recruitment of all Trapezius fibres. Comparatively, Abduction occurring in the Scapula Plane (greater Scapulothoracic Joint - Protraction ) recorded higher activity of the Upper Trapezius , Lateral Deltoid and Serratus Anterior (SOURCE-9). Similarly muscular activity was recorded during Abduction with increased Scapulothoracic Joint - Elevation which lead to greater contributions from the Lateral Deltoid and Upper Trapezius (SOURCE-9).


Pathomechanics

Abnormal Glenohumeral Abduction is typically attributed to insufficient or absentinferior glidemechanics of the Humeral Head, which results in impingement of Supraspinatus muscle and/ or tendon and the Subacromial Bursa , resulting in a pathology known as Subacromial Impingement (SOURCE-11). TheImpingement Zoneat 90º of arm elevation is a position where impingement frequently occurs (SOURCE-16). There are several mechanisms by which impingement can occur during Abduction that are typically associated with:

  • Soft-Tissue Restriction - while there are many soft-tissues that, when restricted, may lead to impingement and indirectly limit the later stages of Flexion, the Posterior Glenohumeral Joint Capsule is one such tissue that directly affects the joint. When shortened this may restrict the slight posterior glide of the Head of Humerus necessary during Abduction which encroaches on the available space and predisposes impingement. An indicator of restriction in the Glenohumeral Joint Capsule is excessive Scapulothoracic Joint - Upward Rotation in the early phases of Abduction as it may represent a compensatory mechanism (SOURCE-2). Although the end-range of maximal arm elevation in any plane is comparable, the Humerus typically has greater GH Joint - External Rotation throughout Abduction which is necessary for the Humeral Head to clear from under the Acromion during the later stages of elevation (SOURCE-18). While the Subscapularis is a major depressor of the joint, as a GH Joint - Internal Rotation muscle it also limits External Rotation. Restriction in this muscle may limit the External Rotation required for adequate clearance of the Acromion and also predispose impingement.

  • Muscle insufficiency - pre-fatigue of the Rotator Cuff has displayed a significant impedance on acute Abduction strength (average reduction of 54%) and narrowing of the Subacromial Space (2-14mm or 6-40%) through superior migration of the Humeral Head (SOURCE-10). This has been attributed to a reduced ability of the Rotator Cuff to counter the superior bias of the Deltoid , which disturbs Glenohumeral arthrokinematics and the length-tension relationship of associated musculature. In a similar fashion, Rotator Cuff Tears may lead to superior migration of the Humeral Head, with the severity of tear correlated with the extent of migration (SOURCE-16). It has been reported without the action of the Serratus Anterior , Scapulothoracic Joint - Upward Rotation is significantly restricted and arm elevation fails to exceed 90º (SOURCE-3)

  • Scapular Dyskinesis - in addition to inaccurate placement of the Glenoid Fossa, altered Scapula mechanics have been shown to narrow the subacromial space to restrict Abduction through impingement (SOURCE-16). Compared to other planes of elevation, Abduction requires greater Scapulothoracic Joint - Upward Rotation , particularly in its initial stages (SOURCE-18). This Scapula motion is often restricted in those with Dyskinesis where it fails to adequately lift the Acromion to clear space for the Humerus , leading to impingement (SOURCE-8)

  • Osseous Morphologies - anatomical variations such as a Hooked Acromion or degenerative formation of Osteophytes (or bone spurs) on the underside of the Acomion may abrade the local soft-tissues during arm elevation often restricting it by Pain (SOURCE-20)

Independent of the impingement cascade, these factors and others may comprise Abduction through diverging mechanisms:

Trauma

Forced External Rotation from a combined position of Abduction, GH Joint - External Rotation and GH Joint - Extension leaves the shoulder particularly vulnerable to Anterior Glenohumeral Dislocation (SOURCE-14)


Pathology

Abduction of the arm may be limited by Pain , mechanical block or protective apprehension caused by several pathologies that affect The Shoulder Girdle . Additionally Abduction may represent a position of vulnerability for traumatic injury or the source of repetitive compressive forces which predisposes multiple acute and chronic injuries.

Subacromial Impingement - represents the consequence of the various pathomechanical issues (including those described in this section) that narrow the subacromial space. During arm elevation the Head of Humerus migrates superiorly which narrows the subacromial space, which typically provokes symptoms within thePainful Arc(~70-120º), with 90º of Abduction considered a primaryImpingement Zone(SOURCE-16+27+28). Abduction is typically the most dysfunctional shoulder motion in impingement, affected by either weakness and/or Pain (SOURCE-5+27).

Rotator Cuff - insufficiency from either a Rotator Cuff Tear or Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy can lead to an impingement cascade as the Rotator Cuff cannot effectively offset the superior and anterior shear force of the Deltoid (SOURCE-24+25+26). Soft-tissue Inflammation from either condition may share a similar impingement fate. The resulting narrowing of the subacromial space may limit Abduction through Pain or mechanical means.

Adhesive Capsulitis - one study found Abduction restriction to be ubiquitous with Capsulitis; however, it is also restricted in the majority of other painful shoulder conditions, making it sensitive but not specific (SOURCE-4). This may in part be due to stiffness in the Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament , which is pulled taut nearing end range (SOURCE-11). From the Freezing stage, this structure progressively forms Contractures and loses its Axillary Pouch, leading to a capsular pattern of restriction where Abduction is typically the second Range of Motion to be affected after GH Joint - External Rotation .

Scapular Dyskinesis - disturbed motion of the Scapula is often reciprocated at the Glenohumeral Joint . For Abduction, reduced movement at one joint if often compensated for by the other (SOURCE-8). Dyskinesis may lead to abnormal placement of the Glenoid Fossa, the surface upon which movement occurs. Additionally, multiple common forms of abnormal Scapular mechanics fall subject to the impingement to also limit Abduction.

Thoracic Spine Kyphosis - a slouched posture of the upper back results in a significant reduction in active Abduction (SOURCE-15)

Subacromial Bursitis - as the Inflammation causes these structures to be more easily compressed this condition may restrict Abduction.


Assessment

Observation

Aside from Abduction limited by Pain , apprehension or a mechanical block, the following signs may be observed with pathologies that affect Abduction (SOURCE-2):

Range of Motion

Abduction of the Glenohumeral Joint represents a major part of the Shoulder - Active Range of Motion and Shoulder - Passive Range of Motion assessment. Approximately 170-180º of total active Abduction should be available to The Shoulder Girdle ; however, studies on the general population have reported ~150º as the average (SOURCE-1+11+23+29). Of this composite motion, true Abduction at the Glenohumeral Joint accounts for ~90-120º (SOURCE-1+11). Abduction appears to diminish with age and is often asymmetrical where the non-dominant hand is slightly more restricted (SOURCE-23). Most often Abduction should be assessed both in isolation and as a composite of motion across The Shoulder Girdle :

  • Isolated Abduction - with one hand the practitioner fixes the movement of the Clavicle and Scapula by pressing down on the Acromion and performs the movement with the other. This is used to evaluate tightness of the Glenohumeral Joint Capsule and the presence of any Subacromial pathology. While 90-120º of isolated Glenohumeral Joint Abduction is considered normal, it has been postulated that anything over 105º requires laxity in the Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament (SOURCE-29)

  • Composite Arm Elevation in Frontal Plane - to evaluate motion across the entire shoulder girdle, Scapulohumeral Rhythm is performed. An approximate movement ratio of 2:1 Humerus : Scapula should be apparent, although this is non-linear and highly variable (SOURCE-29). While better described on its respective page, during Scapulohumeral Rhythm the Humerus is either the sole or predominant contributor to movement up to 90º arm elevation, beyond this point the two structures contribute in a comparable fashion (SOURCE-29). Assessment of this motion may reveal Pain or other forms of dysfunction that may suggest particular tissues or pathologies. If a Painful Arc is present, it may be useful to perform accessory motions ( Joint Play ) within the specific range of Pain (SOURCE-7). Findings should be compared to the asymptomatic side and consider the ascending and descending phases of the movement

If passive Abduction is greater than Abduction the patient can perform actively, neuromusculature is implicated. Isometric Tests of Abduction may also be revealing of contractile dysfunction. 90º of active arm elevation is often described as theImpingement Zoneas it is often provocative of symptoms (SOURCE-16).

Horizontal Abductiondescribes abduction (or extension) of the arm in a posterior direction from a position of 90º of Abduction. In the healthy shoulder, roughly 45º of movement should be available in this direction.

Orthopaedic Tests

The following Shoulder - Special Tests may be relevant in the assessment of dysfunctional Abduction:Muscular:

Subacromial Impingement :

Scapular Dyskinesis :

Glenohumeral Instability :

Radiculopathy :

Neurological Tests

The following tests may be conducted to rule in/out nerve contribution with the C5 Nerve Root most relevant to Abduction: Cervical - Myotomes (active resisted)

Cervical - Dermatomes - evaluates sensory region

  • C5 sensory distribution innervates the area of skin over the lateral arm over the Deltoid

Reflex - diminished reflex indicates potential lesion at corresponding nerve root

Upper Limb Nerve Tension Tests

Imaging

The following imaging modalities may be relevant for the evaluation of Abduction dysfunction:

Ultrasonography (Ultrasound)- a highly accessible imaging modaility with real-time capabilities for the evaluation of soft-tissues including the Subacromial Bursa , Rotator Cuff and their Tendons . A major limitation of this modaility is that it is highly operator dependent. Compared to other imaging modailities, Ultrasounds are less expensive/more practical in the evaluation ofAcromiohumeral Distance, a metric that determines the Subacromial Space (SOURCE-16).

Radiography (X-Ray)- evaluates Bone pathology which could mechanically block Abduction. In addition to visualisation of traumatic injuries such as Fractures to the Head of Humerus or Acromion of Scapula , X-Rays may reveal degenerative osseous changes such as Osteoarthritis , Sclerosis , Osteophytes (bone spurs) and joint space narrowing (Glenohumeral Joint or resting Acromiohumeral Distance).

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MRI- can be used to directly measure the acromiohumeral space with a reduction anticipated in impingement or measure associated metrics such as the width of the Subdeltoid Bursa which indicates impingement through the presence of Bursitis (SOURCE-8+31). MRIs are also the preferred technique for evaluating soft tissues such as the Rotator Cuff , Subacromial Bursa and associated morphologies (SOURCE-31). A “Halo-sign” around Long Head of Biceps Tendon may suggest severity as it represents Glenohumeral Joint effusion and synovial thickening may be visualised in chronic cases (SOURCE-31). For Subacromial Impingement the following view are recommended (SOURCE-31):

  • Proton-density and T1-weighted images in coronal plane

  • T2-weighed images in sagittal plane - high signal fluid within Bursa is a direct sign of Inflammation

  • MR-arthrography with contrast injection - capable of revealing more subtle findings like lesions of the Cartilage or Glenoid Labrum


Treatment

The treatment of Abduction dysfunction should be specific to the underlying cause. For rehabilitation of common underlying conditions such as Subacromial Impingement , Rotator Cuff pathology, Scapular Dyskinesis or Adhesive Capsulitis , see their respective pages.

Stretching

As detailed underPathomechanics, the main points of focus of Stretching for Abduction dysfunction are to restore length/ reduce tone in the Posterior Glenohumeral Joint Capsule , antagonist Muscles and/or address any global shoulder restrictions if present. The following lists stretching techniques that may be directly or indirectly relevant:Simple:

Intermediate:

Advanced:

Strengthening

As a specific training protocol relates to the underlying cause of Abduction dysfunction, the following lists Abduction-based Strength exercises or those that incorporate a component of Abduction in rough descending order from most rudimentary:

Mobilisation

The following Mobilisation techniques may be relevant in the treatment of Abduction: Joint Play

Mobilisation with Movement - as Abduction is affected, mobilisations may benefit from the addition of movement:


References

  1. Clarkson, H. M. (2013). Musculoskeletal assessment: Joint motion and muscle testing (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  2. Struyf, F., Nijs, J., Mottram, S., Roussel, N. A., Cools, A. M., & Meeusen, R. (2014). Clinical assessment of the scapula: a review of the literature. British journal of sports medicine, 48(11), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091059

  3. Hamada, J., Igarashi, E., Akita, K., & Mochizuki, T. (2008). A cadaveric study of the serratus anterior muscle and the long thoracic nerve. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 17(5), 790–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.009

  4. Tandon, A., Dewan, S., Bhatt, S., Jain, A. K., & Kumari, R. (2017). Sonography in diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a case-control study. Journal of ultrasound, 20(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-017-0262-5

  5. Katsuura, Y., Bruce, J., Taylor, S., Gullota, L., & Kim, H. J. (2020). Overlapping, masquerading, and causative cervical spine and shoulder pathology: A systematic review. Global Spine Journal, 10(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218822536

  6. Kebaetse, M., McClure, P., & Pratt, N. A. (1999). Thoracic position effect on shoulder range of motion, strength, and three-dimensional scapular kinematics. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 80(8), 945–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90088-6

  7. Hengeveld, E., & Banks, K. (Eds.). (2005). Maitland’s peripheral manipulation (4th ed.). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

  8. Ludewig, P. M., & Reynolds, J. F. (2009). The association of scapular kinematics and glenohumeral joint pathologies. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 39(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2808

  9. Contemori, S., Panichi, R., & Biscarini, A. (2019). Effects of scapular retraction/protraction position and scapular elevation on shoulder girdle muscle activity during glenohumeral abduction. Human Movement Science, 64, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.01.005

  10. Teyhen DS, Miller JM, Middag TR, Kane EJ. Rotator Cuff Fatigue and Glenohumeral Kinematics in Participants Without Shoulder Dysfunction. Journal of Athletic Training. 2008;43(4):352–358. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.4.352

  11. Neumann, D. A. (2002). Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundations for physical rehabilitation (1st ed.). Mosby.

  12. Reed, D., Cathers, I., Halaki, M., & Ginn, K. (2013). Does supraspinatus initiate shoulder abduction?. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 23(2), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.11.008

  13. Escamilla, R. F., Yamashiro, K., Paulos, L., & Andrews, J. R. (2009). Shoulder muscle activity and function in common shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Sports Medicine, 39(8), 663–685.

  14. Standring, S. (Ed.). (2016). Gray’s anatomy: The anatomical basis of clinical practice (41st ed.). Elsevier.

  15. Otoshi, K., Takegami, M., Sekiguchi, M., Onishi, Y., Yamazaki, S., Otani, K., Shishido, H., Kikuchi, S., & Konno, S. (2014). Association between kyphosis and subacromial impingement syndrome: LOHAS study. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 23(12), e300–e307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.010

  16. Kim, H., Kim, B., Shim, J., Kwon, H., & Jung, J. (2014). Comparative analysis of acromiohumeral distances according to the locations of the arms and humeral rotation. Journal of physical therapy science, 26(1), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.97

  17. Kuechle, D. K., Newman, S. R., Itoi, E., Morrey, B. F., & An, K. N. (1997). Shoulder muscle moment arms during horizontal flexion and elevation. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 6(5), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(97)70049-1

  18. Ludewig, P. M., Phadke, V., Braman, J. P., Hassett, D. R., Cieminski, C. J., & LaPrade, R. F. (2009). Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(2), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01483

  19. Gill, T.K., Shanahan, E.M., Tucker, G.R. et al. Shoulder range of movement in the general population: age and gender stratified normative data using a community-based cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21, 676 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03665-9

  20. Chaimongkhol, T., Benjachaya, S., & Mahakkanukrauh, P. (2020). Acromial morphology and morphometry associated with subacromial impingement syndrome. Anatomy & cell biology, 53(4), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.20.166

  21. Levine, W. N., & Flatow, E. L. (2000). The pathophysiology of shoulder instability. The American journal of sports medicine, 28(6), 910–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465000280062501

  22. Felli, L., Biglieni, L., Fiore, M., Coviello, M., Borri, R., & Cutolo, M. (2012). Functional study of glenohumeral ligaments. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 17(5), 634–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0261-5

  23. Gill, T.K., Shanahan, E.M., Tucker, G.R. et al. Shoulder range of movement in the general population: age and gender stratified normative data using a community-based cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21, 676 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03665-9

  24. Sizer, P. S., Jr., Phelps, V., & Gilbert, K. (2003). Diagnosis and management of the painful shoulder. Part 1: Clinical anatomy and pathomechanics. Pain Practice, 3(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1533-2500.2003.00005.x

  25. Escamilla, R. F., Yamashiro, K., Paulos, L., & Andrews, J. R. (2009). Shoulder muscle activity and function in common shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Sports Medicine, 39(8), 663–685.

  26. Mulla, D. M., Hodder, J. N., Maly, M. R., Lyons, J. L., & Keir, P. J. (2020). Glenohumeral stabilizing roles of the scapulohumeral muscles: Implications of muscle geometry. Journal of biomechanics, 100, 109589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109589

  27. Garving, C., Jakob, S., Bauer, I., Nadjar, R., & Brunner, U. H. (2017). Impingement Syndrome of the Shoulder. Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 114(45), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0765

  28. Creech, J. A., & Silver, S. (2023). Shoulder impingement syndrome. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554518/

  29. Magee, D. J. (2014). Orthopedic physical assessment (6th ed.). Saunders.

  30. Jung, S.-h., Hwang, U.-j., Kim, J.-H., Gwak, G.-T., & Kwon, O.-y. (2022). Effect of improved thoracic kyphosis on forward shoulder posture after mobilization in individuals with thoracic hyperkyphosis. Clinical Biomechanics, 97, 105707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105707

  31. Jäschke, M., Köhler, H. C., Weber, M. A., Tischer, T., Hacke, C., & Schulze, C. (2023). Subacromial impingement syndrome: association of multiple magnetic resonance imaging parameters with shoulder function and pain. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 143(1), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04032-6

Related Articles